Bara lite snö…
Södertörn har den sämsta lärarutbildningen i, i alla fall, hela Sverige, om inte hela världen.1) Ingen framförhållning, 2) otrevliga, oförskämda anställda som saknar vanlig hyfs, 3) ingen koll på någonting, och slutligen 4) måste jagas om man vill få svar på någonting (hänger ihop med övriga punkter). Varför sökte jag mig inte till SU ?
En mycket tidig jul!
My Little Pony-samling i scoutstugan
Thirty things (Preferably Joined Together) That Make a Woman Perfect
Att bryta servetter med origami
This paradox of “non-pathological”, “ethical” Evil is what Sade describes as the “absolute crime” which interrups the circuit of nature: what, namely, is the advent of the human universe if not a break which introduces imbalance into the natural circuit? From the standpoint of Nature, “Spirit” itself is “a crime which can never be effaced”; this is why every positive law is in a way already its own mocking imitation, a violent overthrow of a previous “unwritten” law; a crime turned into law.
How do we account for this paradox that the absence of Law universalizes Prohibition? There is only one possible explanation: enjoyment itself, which we experience as “transgression”, is in its innermost status something imposed, ordered - when we enjoy, we never do it “spontaneously”, we always follow a certain injunction. The psychoanalytic name for this obscene injunction, for this obscene call, “Enjoy!”, is superego. This paradox of the superego is staged in its pure form in Monty Python’s Meaning of Life, in the episode about sexual education: bored schoolboys yawn in the classroom, awaiting their teacher’s arrival; when one of them shouts “He is coming!”, all of a sudden they start to make noise, shout and throw things at each other - the entire spectacle of wild uproar is here exclusively to impress the teacher’s gaze. After quieting them, the teacher begin to examine them on how to arouse the vagina; caught in their ignorance, the embarrassed pupils avoid his gaze and stammer half-articulated answers, while the teacher reprimands them severely for not practising the subject at home. With his wife’s assistance, he thereupon demonstrates to them the penetration of penis into vagina; bored by the subject, one of the schoolboys casts a furtive glance through the window, and the teacher asks him sarcastically: “Would you be kind enough to tell us what is so attractive out there in the courtyard?” Things are here brought to extreme: the reason this inverted presentation of the “normal”, everyday relationship between Law (authority) and pleasure produces such an uncanny effect is of course that it exhibits in broad daylight the unusually concealed truth about the “normal” state of things where enjoyment is sustained by a severe superego imperative.
Kastanjblommor
